Transformation Sprint
A defined problem, a defined period, a defined outcome.
Usually 6–12 weeks, with agreed scope, milestones and deliverables.
What it is
An intensive, tightly scoped assignment aimed at one thing: positioning, go-to-market, sales–marketing alignment, the operating model, or capability. Agreed scope, agreed milestones, agreed deliverables, and a date on which it finishes.
Who it's for
- A business that knows what it needs fixed and wants it fixed now.
- A leadership team stuck between options and unable to spend another quarter deciding.
- A company preparing for something specific; a launch, a market entry, a funding round, a new financial year.
- Anyone who has had a strategy engagement before and got a deck out of it.
The mandate
Deliver the agreed outcome inside the agreed window. The scope is written down before we start and does not quietly expand; if something material surfaces that changes the picture, we stop and re-agree rather than absorb it.
How it runs
Structured in three movements: diagnose the constraint, make the choices, build the operating rhythm behind them. Working sessions with your people rather than an interview phase followed by a reveal; a model built with the team is a model the team uses. Regular checkpoints, so nobody is surprised at the end.
What stays behind
Whatever we agreed the deliverable would be. Sometimes that is a strategy report or a marketing plan; a written document is exactly right when the organization needs one thing it can circulate, approve and work from. Sometimes it is working material the team picks up on Monday. Usually both.
Depending on scope: positioning and messaging with the reasoning intact, a go-to-market architecture, funnel definitions and KPI structure, handling standards and templates, an operating model with roles and decision rights, and a staged implementation roadmap with decision gates.
What it is not
Not a deck that gets presented once and filed. A strategy report or a marketing plan is a good deliverable when that is what you need; the test is whether anyone is still working from it in month three, which is why the operating rhythm is built alongside it rather than recommended in it.
Not open-ended; the end date is part of the product. Not a substitute for leadership: a sprint gives you the choices and the machinery, but someone has to run it afterwards, and if that person doesn't exist yet, that is worth saying before we start rather than after.
Where it usually leads
Often to implementation support at a lighter cadence; advisory, or a fractional day a week, while the team executes. Sometimes to a second sprint on the adjacent constraint. Sometimes to nothing further, which is a legitimate outcome and the reason the scope is fixed.
What I need from you
Access to the people who know, including customers and Sales. A decision-maker available at the checkpoints; a sprint stalls the moment a choice waits two weeks for a diary. And agreement that "what we stop doing" is inside scope.
Engagement model
A fixed fee for a time-boxed sprint, agreed in advance against defined outcomes, deliverables and decision points.
The scope written down at the start. One challenge, one defined period, one agreed investment. If the scope changes materially, we agree the change before the work continues, not after.
Fees are exclusive of VAT and travel. Terms, notice period and invoicing rhythm are agreed in writing before the work starts.
